As
if competition for exclusive contracts is not fierce enough already, on
March 15, 2012, the California Court of Appeal upheld a trial court
ruling that nurse anesthetists in the state do not require physician
supervision.
The California Society of Anesthesiologists and the California
Medical Association filed the lawsuit, and the appeal, to block the
governor’s decision to opt out from Medicare’s physician supervision
rule. The associations had asserted that California law does not permit
independent practice by certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs).
In its opinion, the appeals court relied on the specific California
statute defining the practice of nursing, which states that the Board of
Registered Nursing, and no other agency, is vested with the power to
define the scope of nursing practice. The court noted that the board has
repeatedly expressed its view that physician supervision of CRNAs is
not required.
The court also pointed out that there is specific statutory authority
for the fact that CRNAs may administer anesthesia to implement a
treatment ordered by a physician—in other words, the surgeons “order”
the anesthesia and the fulfillment of that request is up to the CRNA.
The associations urged the court to consider “ordered by a physician”
as requiring physician oversight. They found no support for that
interpretation.
The California Society of Anesthesiologists has announced that it
will file a petition for review, the first step in an appeal to the
California Supreme Court.
Pandora’s Box
Why were judges at both the trial and appellate levels skeptical of
the argument by the two associations? A look at California’s Nursing
Practice Act reveals a clue. The act, which specifies the scope of
practice and duties for registered nurses, states, “the Legislature
recognizes that nursing is a dynamic field, the practice of which is continually evolving to include more sophisticated patient care activities.
It is the intent of the Legislature in amending this section at the
1973-74 session to provide clear legal authority for functions and
procedures that have common acceptance and usage. It is the legislative intent also to recognize the existence of overlapping functions between physicians and registered nurses
and to permit additional sharing of functions within organized health
care systems that provide for collaboration between physicians and
registered nurses …” (emphasis added).
This language is a treasure trove for CRNAs as well as other nurses
who will clearly benefit economically as hospitals, payers and the
government exert increasing pressure to expand the scope of nursing.
For example, several years ago, the California Board of Registered
Nursing issued a letter endorsing the complete independent practice by
CRNAs, including performance of procedures to treat both acute and
chronic pain. That letter was withdrawn when the California Society of
Anesthesiologists attacked it as an improperly adopted regulation.
However, the latest ruling underscores the fact that had the nursing
board gone through the proper channels to push its position in the form
of a regulation, not an informal yet public letter, it would now be
viewed as consistent with California law.
What Next?
Whether you are an anesthesiologist or a CRNA, if you practice in
California competition for exclusive contracts, both at ambulatory
surgery centers and at hospitals, will increase as CRNA groups begin to
seek those arrangements.
To be sure, specific medical staff bylaws may be more or less
permissive in terms of the scope of CRNA practice at a given facility.
Similarly, a particular insurance or managed care plan may not reimburse
for unsupervised CRNA charges. Still, those issues are likely to be
resolved relatively quickly—and in a manner consistent with the
expanding role of nurses.
If you are an anesthesiologist practicing in a non–opt-out state
(Figure), political pressure is sure to mount within your state for both
an opt-out and, if necessary, an expansion of the definition and role
of nursing to accommodate it. In other words, competition is destined to
get tougher for you, too.
Explore Your Options
The competitive landscape for anesthesiologists is dynamic and
rapidly changing. Competition, once limited to a somewhat benign concern
that a group from across town would scoop up a stray ambulatory surgery
center or seek to displace your group as the holder of its sole
exclusive contract, has burgeoned.
In addition to aggressive local groups, truly national groups are
seeking to expand across the country; staffing services and anesthesia
management companies are masquerading as groups, seeking to do the same
thing; and now, in opt-out states such as California—one of 16—CRNA
groups will be seeking those same opportunities for themselves.
These trends further underscore the fact that groups must adopt
actual business structures and seek to provide unique value—what I have
called an “experience monopoly”—to their facilities, referring surgeons,
patients and the larger medical staff and community. Simply continuing
to provide a service to the hospital, even a clinically competent
service, is equivalent to providing a commodity, one that will be
provided for less or with more panache by one of the many new
competitors in a race to the lowest bottom line.
__________________________________________________________________
Mark F.
Weiss, JD, is an attorney who specializes in the business and legal
issues affecting physicians and physician groups on a national basis. He
holds an appointment as clinical assistant professor of anesthesiology
at USC’s Keck School of Medicine and practices with Advisory Law Group, a
firm with offices in Los Angeles and Santa Barbara, Calif.,
representing clients across the country. He can be reached by email at
markweiss@advisorylawgroup.com.
__________________________________________________________________
What is a DNAP? www.DNAP.com ~ And why are Anesthesiologists nervous?
__________________________________________________________________
Anesthesia Resources:
AnesthesiologistAssistant.com
AnesthesiaAssistant.com
AnesthesiaTechnician.com
AnesthesiaCareTeam.com
AnesthesiaMedications.com
SSL Certificate Authority
Topic Options
